Skip to main content

Pakistan: A form of country-strengthening democracy

 

President Dr. Arif Alvi has presented some suggestions to bring stability in the country while addressing a function in University of Karachi. These suggestions have been considered important by serious thinkers. President Alvi said that the country can become strong with democracy. The second suggestion of the President is that all politicians should unite for the sake of national interest. His third suggestion is to decide on general elections in the country.

The President has tried several times in his personal capacity in the last 10 months to prevent political conflict and chaos. President Arif Alvi has repeatedly offered to play a role in negotiations between PDM, Tehreek-e-Insaf and the main forces, which was ignored by the political forces willing to clash. A second order to stop the clash could have been issued by the Supreme Court. The stubborn situation of the political forces is that the highest court of the country directs the elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, but the government and related institutions put obstacles in it. Pakistan has weakened not only politically but also economically and socially. Political parties are primarily social organizations. Political parties place the concept of sovereignty in their manifestos. As the needs and thinking of the society change, the political parties adapt themselves to this new concern.

 Democracy is popular as a beneficial system in societies where political parties are flexible. Repeated dictatorship in Pakistan did not allow democracy to flourish. Thus, the relationship between the society and the government could not be strengthened. Then the parties that came to power in the name of democracy added dynastic dictatorship to their internal structure. Due to this, the collective concern of the society became a hostage of a few families. The democracy by which the countries are stable is not the form that we are facing. Democracy has not strengthened in the dear country. The reason for this is the undemocratic behavior of individuals and institutions associated with the democratic process. Democratic behavior is the name of meeting with each other, communication and dialogue. The democratic behavior of politicians is that they do not bring personal animosity into the middle of any issue. The focus of their activities and thinking is state interest.

The situation here is that when the PDM came to power, the first thing it did was to dispose of the cases of its leaders. When it was seen that there could be punishment in the cases under trial in the courts, then the rules of NAB were changed. This behavior is not political and democratic but selfish. Similarly, in recent days, the record of Toshakhana from 2002 to 2023 was presented. Observers believe that this is not a complete record. However, the details that have come out show that the ruling elite lacks even the basic attribute of trustworthiness. Detachment from the collective thinking of the society and greed of the rulers has led to the weakening of democracy. Democracy strengthens the country when each party recognizes the right of the other to rule. Politicians in America, Britain and India have mutual battles.

Sometimes this criticism reaches intolerable levels, but it has never happened that the right of the party that gets the majority of votes is not recognized. The voters of Pakistan had given the right to rule to the PTI by giving them a majority. The PDM parties turned the majority into a minority through political and administrative tactics and forced the country's most popular party to resign from Parliament. The result of denying his right to rule is that people are coming out in opposition to the entire system. If the situation continues like this for some time, there is a fear of changing the face of democracy. Democracy is a system of peaceful transfer of power and social participation. King, military dictator or hereditary rule is the power of certain classes, the common man does not participate in it. People who are part of the political process need to analyze what role they want to play in politics. The answer to their question will determine whether Pakistan's system is capable of recovering from the dysfunction or not. There is no doubt that the best way to bridge serious differences is for politicians to agree on a single national agenda. Pakistan needs social harmony and peace. There is a need to restore the investment climate. Public participation in power has to be found. Simplicity and frugality should be practiced at the government and public level. The true values and traditions of democracy should be given a chance to flourish. The rest of the national interests can reach the stage of fulfillment in this atmosphere. It has become necessary to give a fresh start to all political forces by holding general elections.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECP vs PTI: The Great 'Bat'-tle - A Comedy of Symbolic Proportions

  In the latest episode of the gripping political sitcom, "As the Election Symbol Turns," the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) seems to have developed an unexpected phobia – an acute fear of bats. No, not the flying nocturnal creatures, but the electoral symbol of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). It all started when the Peshawar High Court (PHC) delivered a verdict that left the ECP in a state of shock and awe. The court, channeling its inner superhero, swooped in and decreed that PTI could keep its beloved 'bat' symbol, much to the dismay of the ECP, which is now contemplating its own superhero move – a daring appeal to the Supreme Court. Picture this: ECP officials in capes, armed with legal briefs and grappling hooks, preparing to challenge the mighty 'bat' in the hallowed halls of justice. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's the ECP, ready to face the daunting foe – a winged mammal holding a cricket bat. The high-stakes saga began when the ...

The Role of Foul Language in Escalating Political Turmoil in Pakistan

  In recent times, the political landscape of Pakistan has been marred by increasing tensions and confrontations among political parties. The use of foul language and derogatory remarks has become a prevalent feature, contributing significantly to the present turmoil. The recent comments made by PML-N Chief Organiser Maryam Nawaz, labeling the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) as a "terrorist party," highlight the sharp rhetoric that has characterized political discourse. This article delves into the impact of foul language on the political climate, its consequences, and the need for a more constructive dialogue. The Weaponization of Language: The political arena in Pakistan has witnessed a disturbing trend of language being weaponized for political gains. Maryam Nawaz's choice of words, accusing the PTI of being a "terrorist party" and referencing the recent controversy over the party's electoral symbol, adds fuel to an already fiery environment. Such language...

Judicial Drama Unveiled: Pakistan's Supreme Soap Opera

  In a stunning plot twist that even the most seasoned soap opera writers would find hard to believe, the latest season of "Justice Chronicles: Pakistan Edition" has introduced a new character—Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi. In a move that would make legal dramas everywhere envious, Justice Naqvi has taken center stage by filing a petition against the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) and claiming that the complaints against him are nothing more than a politically motivated script. Cue the dramatic music as Justice Naqvi contends that he's just a humble actor, sorry, judge, fulfilling his solemn duty to protect and safeguard the Constitution. It seems the delay in the general elections in the provincial assembly of Punjab is the perfect backdrop for this courtroom drama. Move over, Shakespeare—this is a tale of political intrigue and financial misconduct accusations that puts Hamlet to shame. In a petition submitted under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, Justice Naq...