Voice For Peace

  In recent times, the political landscape of Pakistan has been marred by increasing tensions and confrontations among political parties. The use of foul language and derogatory remarks has become a prevalent feature, contributing significantly to the present turmoil. The recent comments made by PML-N Chief Organiser Maryam Nawaz, labeling the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) as a "terrorist party," highlight the sharp rhetoric that has characterized political discourse. This article delves into the impact of foul language on the political climate, its consequences, and the need for a more constructive dialogue. The Weaponization of Language: The political arena in Pakistan has witnessed a disturbing trend of language being weaponized for political gains. Maryam Nawaz's choice of words, accusing the PTI of being a "terrorist party" and referencing the recent controversy over the party's electoral symbol, adds fuel to an already fiery environment. Such language...

In the grand theatre of democracy, where politicians tango with resolutions and Election Commissions take center stage, the recent events in the Pakistani Senate have added an unexpected twist to the choreography. As the country gears up for the February 8 general elections, it seems some senators are attempting a dance of delay, leaving the audience scratching their heads in bemusement. Enter Independent Senator Dilawar Khan, the maestro behind the resolution that has become the talk of the town. In a letter to Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani, Khan expressed his dismay at the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for not pirouetting to the Senate's tune. The upper house had passed a resolution on January 5, albeit thinly attended, urging the postponement of the upcoming elections due to security and bad weather concerns. Now, one might wonder why a resolution was introduced in such a sparsely populated session. It turns out that Khan, along with his accomplices from the Balochistan...

  In a notable turn of events, the political landscape of PK-72 witnesses a significant shift as Azmat Khan, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz's (PML-N) candidate, secures another victory by welcoming Tajik Muhammad Abrar Amin, a former leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), into the PML-N fold. This development underscores the growing appeal of PML-N in the region, with Azmat Khan attributing this trend to the party's commitment to national development and the welfare of its people. Azmat Khan's Political Journey: Azmat Khan, recently nominated as the PML-N candidate for the PK-72 seat, has rapidly emerged as a formidable political force in the region. His ability to attract leaders from opposing parties, such as Tajik Muhammad Abrar Amin, speaks volumes about his political acumen and the appeal of PML-N's vision under his leadership. Party's Commitment to Development: Azmat Khan, in his recent statements, emphasized PML-N's dedication to progress and dev...

  In the grand theater of Pakistani politics, where political maneuvering is as common as chai on a Lahore street corner, a new act has taken center stage. Chief Justice of Pakistan, Qazi Faez Isa, is wielding the judicial cricket bat, and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) is desperately trying not to be bowled out. Picture this: a three-judge Supreme Court bench led by CJP Isa, not satisfied with the PTI's petition on "enforced disappearances." It's like a cricket match where the batsman is desperately trying to hit the googly, but the bowler is throwing legal curveballs. And guess who's in the commentary box? None other than Chaudhry Aitzaz Ahsan, a seasoned politician and lawyer, ready to face the googlies and bouncers of justice. CJP Isa, like a stern umpire, questions Ahsan's "locus standi." It's not your everyday courtroom drama; it's a judicial power play. The CJP suggests that the petition might be for the "benefit" of a po...

  Once upon a time in the mystic land of Pakistan, where politics is a sport more intense than a cricket match, a peculiar battle unfolded between the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and the cricket-loving, politically charged Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). It all began with a quest for the holy grail of political identities – the iconic 'cricket bat' symbol. In a courtroom drama fit for a blockbuster film, the ECP and PTI engaged in a tug of war, leaving the fate of the cricket bat hanging in the balance. Picture this: a courtroom filled with lawyers passionately arguing their case, and the judge, Justice Ejaz Khan, presiding over the matter with the seriousness of an umpire at a high-stakes cricket match. The ECP, like a stern cricket umpire, raised its finger and declared, "Out!" as it invalidated PTI's internal elections and snatched away the beloved 'cricket bat' symbol. The reason? Alleged non-compliance with election rules and the PTI constit...

  In a stunning turn of events that could rival Shakespearean tragedies, the political landscape in Pakistan has taken a darkly comedic twist. The latest episode features Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Vice Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), as the unwitting star of a tragicomedy that would leave even the Bard scratching his head. Qureshi, recently released and re-arrested with a flair for dramatic exits, entered the courtroom like a protagonist in a gripping play. Handcuffed, he walked towards justice with the poise of a man who had just discovered the script was written by Kafka. As the courtroom drama unfolded, Qureshi pleaded with the judge to record his statement first, a request that likely had the writers of this tragicomedy rolling in laughter. He recounted a harrowing tale of being tortured and ridiculed, transforming the courtroom into a stage where the lines between tragedy and farce blurred like a poorly subtitled foreign film. In a surprising twist, the judge ordered t...

  In recent days, the political landscape in Pakistan has been marred by a heated dispute between the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) over the party's election symbol, the 'bat.' The controversy has escalated to the point where the matter is now expected to reach the Supreme Court, adding another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal saga. This article delves into the key arguments presented by both parties and explores the legal implications of the PTI symbol controversy. Background: The controversy originated from the ECP's decision to strip the PTI of its electoral symbol following the annulment of its intra-party elections. The ECP argued that the PTI failed to comply with the Elections Act and its own constitution during these internal polls. Kanwar Dilshad, a former ECP secretary, supported this move, citing the PTI's alleged failure to justify the source of its funding as a reason for withholding the ...