Skip to main content

Afghan conflict: US Secretary of State's contact with Pakistan


 

Eventually, US officials decided to maintain high-level contacts with Pakistan, and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken called Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi to discuss Afghan issues. Anthony Blinken assured that the United States would continue its support for peace in Afghanistan, regional stability and the elimination of Corona.

The telephone conversation between the foreign ministers of the two countries is important in the sense that Anthony Blanken had earlier ordered Prime Minister Imran Khan to speak instead of the foreign minister, to which Pakistani officials assured him that the prime minister will speak with the US president only. Blanken should talk to his counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi. US officials persisted in their decision not to contact Pakistan for several weeks, but as the situation in Afghanistan changed, the United States had to change its approach and contact Pakistan in accordance with diplomatic protocol. The United States has been part of the Afghan conflict for the past 45 years.

The United States used Afghanistan as a battlefield to overthrow the Soviet Union. Pakistan's role in this war was of a fundamental nature, which the United States put in the swing of Charlie Wilson and the CIA after the victory. Pakistan received gifts like refugees, drugs, weapons and professional differences during this period. Had the Afghan Taliban not emerged under Mullah Omar's leadership, Pakistan would have been further affected by the negative effects coming from Afghanistan. The Taliban under Mullah Omar's leadership rendered ineffective the factions fighting for power in Afghanistan.

The Taliban ended the insurgency on the Pak-Afghan border. He was recognized by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, but the rest of the world ignored Afghanistan and the Taliban and went about their business. The Taliban were not responsible for the 9/11 attacks. When the Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden at the request of the United States, the United States invaded with 30 countries. It was a strong position of a poor and weak country according to its traditions which the United States failed to change. The rest of history is that the United States came to Afghanistan with an agenda to fight terrorism but after the death of Osama bin Laden. Instead of going back, he started a new plan with India against China and Pakistan. The United States announced its withdrawal from Afghanistan for the first time by 2014. President Trump announced his withdrawal during his tenure when no significant arrangements were made for his return. Pakistan persuaded the Afghan Taliban to negotiate first with the United States and then with the Afghan government. When the United States was killing innocent children and Afghan citizens in the name of the war on terror, it was Pakistan that took the position that the war in the Afghan conflict was not the solution. The US ignored Pakistan and planned to protect its interests in Afghanistan through India. The plan failed due to unrealistic expectations.

The Taliban are claiming control of 85 percent of Afghanistan. The Taliban have seized control of the border areas with Tajikistan and Iran. There are recent reports that Afghan security forces are surrendering in many parts of Kandahar. The Taliban are also saying this. No external force should interfere in Afghanistan. The Taliban have adopted a better strategy of maintaining regular contact with China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. The Taliban have promised to protect the diplomatic staff of various countries.

US experts familiar with Pakistan and Afghanistan have been advising President Joe Biden to speak to the Pakistani leadership himself. A few days ago, Senator Lance Graham warned President Biden that ignoring Pakistan during its withdrawal from Afghanistan could lead to disaster. Recently, an American journalist asked Prime Minister Imran Khan during an interview what If he wanted to contact President Biden, the prime minister's response was in line with diplomatic and national dignity that Biden could call him whenever he had time. If the US role after the withdrawal was based on detachment, the consequences could be many.

Organizations like ISIS can make their home in Afghanistan, not only the countries of the region but also American interests can be insecure. The United States should persuade the Afghan government to take advantage of the Taliban's offer of power-sharing. President Ashraf Ghani and his allies are deliberately creating an environment in which the Taliban can invade Kabul and shed human blood. The Taliban have so far handled matters with restraint and wisdom. The United States has negotiated with them and recognized them as a legal force. If a new political system is introduced in Afghanistan under the leadership of the Taliban, then the United States, the United Nations and NATO should recognize it so that the world can get rid of an old armed conflict.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECP vs PTI: The Great 'Bat'-tle - A Comedy of Symbolic Proportions

  In the latest episode of the gripping political sitcom, "As the Election Symbol Turns," the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) seems to have developed an unexpected phobia – an acute fear of bats. No, not the flying nocturnal creatures, but the electoral symbol of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). It all started when the Peshawar High Court (PHC) delivered a verdict that left the ECP in a state of shock and awe. The court, channeling its inner superhero, swooped in and decreed that PTI could keep its beloved 'bat' symbol, much to the dismay of the ECP, which is now contemplating its own superhero move – a daring appeal to the Supreme Court. Picture this: ECP officials in capes, armed with legal briefs and grappling hooks, preparing to challenge the mighty 'bat' in the hallowed halls of justice. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's the ECP, ready to face the daunting foe – a winged mammal holding a cricket bat. The high-stakes saga began when the ...

The Role of Foul Language in Escalating Political Turmoil in Pakistan

  In recent times, the political landscape of Pakistan has been marred by increasing tensions and confrontations among political parties. The use of foul language and derogatory remarks has become a prevalent feature, contributing significantly to the present turmoil. The recent comments made by PML-N Chief Organiser Maryam Nawaz, labeling the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) as a "terrorist party," highlight the sharp rhetoric that has characterized political discourse. This article delves into the impact of foul language on the political climate, its consequences, and the need for a more constructive dialogue. The Weaponization of Language: The political arena in Pakistan has witnessed a disturbing trend of language being weaponized for political gains. Maryam Nawaz's choice of words, accusing the PTI of being a "terrorist party" and referencing the recent controversy over the party's electoral symbol, adds fuel to an already fiery environment. Such language...

Judicial Drama Unveiled: Pakistan's Supreme Soap Opera

  In a stunning plot twist that even the most seasoned soap opera writers would find hard to believe, the latest season of "Justice Chronicles: Pakistan Edition" has introduced a new character—Justice Syed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi. In a move that would make legal dramas everywhere envious, Justice Naqvi has taken center stage by filing a petition against the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) and claiming that the complaints against him are nothing more than a politically motivated script. Cue the dramatic music as Justice Naqvi contends that he's just a humble actor, sorry, judge, fulfilling his solemn duty to protect and safeguard the Constitution. It seems the delay in the general elections in the provincial assembly of Punjab is the perfect backdrop for this courtroom drama. Move over, Shakespeare—this is a tale of political intrigue and financial misconduct accusations that puts Hamlet to shame. In a petition submitted under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, Justice Naq...