The recent grenade attack at the residence of former Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Saqib Nisar in Lahore's Garden Town has brought the controversial figure back into the public eye. As two police constables were injured in the attack, the incident highlights the lingering impact of Nisar's tenure and the controversies that surrounded his judicial career.
Judicial Activism and Departure from Earlier Approach:
Saqib Nisar's judicial career, spanning over two decades, witnessed a notable shift in approach, particularly in his final years as the Chief Justice. Initially known for his pro-executive and pro-parliament stance, Nisar's later years were marked by what some describe as unique judicial activism. His departure from the traditional approach raised eyebrows and fueled perceptions of bias among political circles.
Controversial Cases and Political Fallout:
The grenade attack coincides with renewed attention on Nisar's involvement in high-profile cases, such as the Supreme Court's 2017 verdict that spared then-Premier Imran Khan from disqualification. Nisar's declaration of Imran Khan as 'sadiq and ameen' further fueled suspicions of political maneuvering.
The Panamagate case, which led to the disqualification of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, also contributed to Nisar's divisive legacy. The decision to disqualify Nawaz as PML-N head and the subsequent legal actions against PML-N workers intensified the political fallout.
Shift in Approach Towards Military Establishment:
While Nisar remained tough on politicians, media figures, and top officials, critics argue that his approach towards the military establishment remained consistent. Some accused him of weakening civilian supremacy by not challenging the military's influence.
Public Interest Initiatives and Unique Judicial Practices:
Nisar's tenure was characterized by unprecedented initiatives, including hearing cases on weekends, conducting proceedings in public interest matters at the Lahore Registry, and actively engaging in issues related to water, health, education, and population control. His fundraising campaign for the construction of dams, despite reservations, garnered both praise and criticism.
Legacy and Criticisms:
Nisar's legacy is marked by a mix of praise and criticism. While some appreciate his efforts in highlighting issues like water shortage, others view his judicial activism as a departure from his earlier principles. The controversy surrounding his alleged bias and the fallout from high-profile cases continue to shape public perceptions.
Conclusion:
The grenade attack at Saqib Nisar's residence serves as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding his legacy. As the former Chief Justice navigated through contentious cases, his departure from traditional judicial norms and his stance on critical issues left an indelible mark on Pakistan's legal landscape. The ongoing debates and controversies surrounding his tenure underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of his contributions and the lasting impact on the country's judiciary.
Comments
Post a Comment