In the grand theatre of justice, where the curtains of accountability rise and fall, the latest blockbuster hit seems to be the acquittal of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in the Al-Azizia Steel Mills corruption reference. It's a comedy, a tragicomedy, to be precise, where the protagonists and antagonists shuffle their lines like a poorly rehearsed play.
Picture this: a two-member Islamabad High Court (IHC) bench, starring Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb, taking center stage. The prosecution team of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) eagerly awaiting their cue, alongside the PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif and his counsel, the talented Amjad Pervaiz. It's a courtroom drama of epic proportions, with twists and turns that even Shakespeare would envy.
As the curtains rise, Pervaiz, with the grace of a seasoned actor, takes the rostrum to argue about Nawaz's dependents. But alas, Justice Farooq, playing the stern director, informs him that his arguments had already taken their final bow. Undeterred, Pervaiz insists on a solo performance, focusing on a single point like a stand-up comedian fixated on a punchline.
The plot thickens as Pervaiz skillfully navigates the court's labyrinth, pointing out that the prosecution failed to prove anything regarding Nawaz's dependents. A clever move, using witness Wajid Zia's admission as a trump card, claiming there's no evidence linking the PML-N leader to his dependents. The defense, much like a cunning jest, raises objections and reminds the court of the trial court's reliance on a TV interview—a spectacle in itself.
Pervaiz, with a twinkle in his eye, declares that the accused is innocent until proven guilty, asserting that the burden of proof lies solely on the prosecution. "The accused cannot be forced to prove his innocence," he proclaims, leaving the audience in stitches. It's a masterclass in legal comedy.
Cue the NAB prosecutor, who steps onto the rostrum to narrate the sequence of events leading to Nawaz's conviction, playing the straight man to Pervaiz's comedic brilliance. The audience is left wondering if they stumbled into a courtroom or a comedy club.
Meanwhile, outside the IHC premises, a large crowd of PML-N supporters gathers, creating a carnival-like atmosphere. It's a sideshow to the main act, with pro-PML-N lawyers adding their own dramatic flair to the spectacle. The security arrangements are reminiscent of a high-stakes Hollywood premiere, but instead of A-list celebrities, it's judges and politicians making headlines.
In this absurd comedy of justice, the script takes unexpected turns. The accountability judge, Arshad Malik, becomes a character straight out of a soap opera, confessing under alleged duress in a series of scandalous videos. The Lahore High Court, playing the role of the disciplinary committee, dismisses the judge for misconduct, adding a surreal twist to an already bizarre plot.
As the curtain falls on the Al-Azizia saga, the audience is left with a mix of laughter and bewilderment. In the grand play of justice, where the lines between tragedy and farce blur, Nawaz Sharif emerges unscathed, proving once again that in the theatre of Pakistani politics, reality is often stranger than fiction.
Comments
Post a Comment